Throughout APSC 169, I gained a clearer understanding of the engineering design process as a structured yet highly iterative workflow. I learned that engineering rarely moves linearly; instead, it requires cycles of prototyping, testing, failure, and refinement. Our project demonstrated this clearly, as our team moved from complex detection technologies toward a simpler, more practical chemical-based solution.
This course also highlighted the attributes engineers must embody. Effective engineers must be adaptable, analytical, and communicative. They must be able to translate complex problems into understandable components for diverse audiences. Collaboration was equally important—understanding the strengths of teammates allowed us to make progress more efficiently.
Working on a project centered around lead contamination helped expand my understanding of an engineer’s responsibility to society. Engineers directly influence public health, environmental safety, and community trust. In our case, even a simple testing device had the potential to protect families and raise awareness about hidden risks in water systems. This reinforced the idea that engineering solutions must balance innovation with safety, feasibility, and accessibility.
This course also helped me identify my own strengths. I bring commitment, attention to detail, and strong communication skills to team environments—qualities that supported both the development and presentation of our design. At the same time, I recognize areas where I can grow, particularly in technical design confidence and early-stage prototyping. I plan to improve by taking on more hands-on engineering opportunities, strengthening my CAD and technical modeling skills, and seeking continuous feedback.
Create Your Own Website With Webador